Vipin Joshi is currently working as QA Team Lead at Cynoteck with more than 7 years of experience majorly in Salesforce technology. He is graduate (B.Tech) in Computer Science & Engg from Gurukul Kangri University Haridwar, was born in a small town, Chamoli, situated at the northern Himalayan region of India. He has vast experience Read More
We are Microsoft Gold partner with its presence across the United States and India. We are a dynamic and professional IT services provider that serves enterprises and startups, helping them meet the challenges of the global economy. We offer services in the area of CRM Consultation and implementation, Application development, Mobile application development, Web development & Offshore Development.
Cypress vs Selenium – Select your Automation Framework
Recently, there has been an argument about the new Champion of functional test automation tools. Some say it's Cypress.io. because is interactive, fast, reliable and the greatest.
This argument leads us to the big question, “has Cypress successfully dethroned Selenium WebDriver?" Selenium which is currently the king of web automation and testing frameworks, has been known by many individuals for a while now. While its presumed usurper, which is still young, is growing at an incredibly fast rate.
Introduction to Selenium and Cypress
To begin with, let’s give an accurate definition of these two solutions are and what they offer to their users before we go over the comparison.
Selenium is a test automation tool that allows developers to automate web browser testing.
The Selenium WebDriver protocol allows developers to send commands in diverse development languages such as Java, JavaScript, C#, Python, etc.
Right from the test environment (IDEs) to a desktop browser of your choice such as Chrome, Firefox, Edge, or Safari.
All the browsers have their unique Web Driver that is a reliance for the test to be able to accurately communicate and carry out the needed actions such as click, swipe, assert, etc.
As the leading solution, Selenium acts as a platform to standard test frameworks like Protractor, WebDriverIO, etc., and also mobile app testing frameworks such as Appium.
Having a view of the market trends based on adoption and downloads, it is discovered that Selenium is a major enabler for browser test automation.
The growth in the adoption of Cypress which has passed WebDriverIO in the number of downloads, which is so visible for everyone to see.
An Open-Source Software- All Selenium Projects (Selenium IDE, Selenium RC, Selenium WebDriver, and Selenium Grid) are available for free use and are distributed under the Apache 2.0 license. Anyone is welcome to download the source code and use it; however, selling modified code is not permitted.
Selenium supports various operating systems- Selenium WebDriver is a part of Selenium that serves as a browser automation framework that handles browser commands and supports multiple operating systems, including Windows, Linux, macOS, and Solaris.
One Selenium script for all browsers- Every day, the Selenium community works on and improvises. The most popular browsers globally, according to StatCounter, are Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Internet Explorer, Opera, and Edge. Selenium script is compatible with all of the aforementioned browsers.
Easy to implement- The Selenium automation framework is a tool that is relatively simple to use. It offers a user-friendly interface that makes it simple and efficient to design and run test scripts.
Better learning- When beginning with Selenium automation testing, developers and testers can benefit greatly from the documentation on the Selenium website. Selenium scripts are not the same as complicated, 100-page algorithms. Writing a few lines of code to automate your website's capabilities is all it takes to create a Selenium script.
Limitations of Selenium
[embedimage]
Time-consuming- In contrast to several other test automation frameworks, Selenium WebDriver does not add an IDE to the programming interface. As a result, while writing test scripts for specific jobs, testers must include stages.
Lacks built-in reporting feature- Testers can more easily generate and show test results thanks to licensed test automation frameworks' built-in result-reporting functionality. Selenium still lacks the ability to generate result reports internally.
Single browser- Without writing test scripts, testers may test web applications with Selenium IDE. The record and playback tool allow a tester or even a developer to test websites without any prior programming knowledge.
Missed advanced features- Other test automation tools and frameworks now offer some of the most cutting-edge features that Selenium Automation Tool does not. The testers can add commands, breakpoints, and comments using this tool.
Testing mobile apps- We are unable to test Windows and mobile applications in Selenium. With the use of a WebDriver Protocol, the tester must use Appium to manage the Android and iOS apps.
Save time and reduce errors with our Automated Testing service.
Our cutting-edge technology ensures your software runs smoothly, without the hassle of manual testing.
Cypress is a JavaScript test automation solution for web applications. It allows teams to develop web test automation scripts.
The aim of this to enable frontend developers and test automation engineers to write web tests in the de-solution is to allow facto web language which is JavaScript.
Cypress also supports the Mocha test framework. So that the main technologies in which you would develop in your web test automation are Java Script.
Easy Setup – In Cypress, the setup is actually very simple because libraries and dependencies have already been established.
Supportive Snapshots- The Cypress framework takes pictures while the test is running. In the Command Log, this enables QAs or developers to hover over a specific command to view exactly what transpired at that particular stage.
Efficient process- It is not necessary to include wait-for commands in test scripts, either implicit or explicit. Prior to acting, it awaits orders and statements.
Automated scrolling- Before taking any action, the automated scrolling function makes sure that an element is visible (for example Clicking on a button).
Convenient visual feedback- Cypress runs instructions in real-time as the programmer types them, showing visual feedback as they do so. Cypress comes with top-notch documentation.
One at a time - Cypress cannot be used to run two browsers simultaneously.
No multi-language support- Unlike Selenium, Cypress only works on Java scripts and limits user options to work in multiple domains.
Limited options- Cypress forbids the testing of photos, videos, or audio. On the other hand, Selenium allows screen capture.
Browser support- Cypress doesn't offer compatibility with browsers like Safari and IE. It is not possible to simultaneously drive two browsers.
Slower execution speed- The initial stage of Cypress testing execution pace is acceptable and may be appropriate for a demo, however, this would slow down as the app scaled.
Differences between Cypress and Selenium
Difference in terms of
Cypress
Selenium
Execution Speed
Uses in-browser execution to send commands via DOM events, resulting in synchronous, in-memory commands and fast tests.
Uses out-of-process communication to send commands via WebDriver, resulting in asynchronous communication and slower tests.
Testing Framework
Restricted to Mocha testing framework and can't use other JavaScript frameworks like Jest or Tape.
No enforcement of testing framework and can use any JavaScript framework or even non-test programs.
Execution Model
Records commands like cy.click or cy.type to be replayed later after it function ends.
Executes commands directly, allowing for executing code based on the value on the page.
Built-In Server Mocking
Has built-in functions for mocking server responses, allowing for fast tests.
Doesn't have built-in functions for mocking server responses and requires running a mock server, resulting in slower tests.
In terms of Speed
This in-browser execution is based on the speed of Cypress testing. With Cypress, you have just a process: which is the browser itself. With Cypress, your test code is running together with your application code.
So, an automation command such as clicking a button doesn’t send the command to the browser as WebDriver does via out-of-process communication. Rather, Cypress makes use of DOM events to send a click command to the button within a short time.
And while WebDriver’s out-of-process automation includes asynchronous communication, Cypress’ automation commands are mainly synchronous and in-memory. And it generates extraordinarily fast tests.
We know that speed is the major reason that front-end developers are totally in love with Cypress. WebDriver, at least perception-wise, wasn’t able to give them the speed that they required.
Frontend developers want to run their tests always, and they can’t afford the expense of a suite that takes about ten minutes to run. They desire to run their suite, and they require it to run in a minute or two, and nothing more.
Is the speed difference significant based on the claims of Cypress’ documentation claims? Based on the research carried out, the answer is Yes.
Although we are not convinced that the difference is worth the other benefits WebDriver has. You can try it yourself, by carrying out some little research and experiments.
Being Mocha!
Cypress doesn’t only restrict you in the language you can write, but also restricts the type of testing framework you can use.
Mocha is the testing framework on which you write your tests with a testing framework’s role in JavaScript similar to the role Junit has in Java, or NUnit in C#. You won’t be able to write your tests in another JavaScript framework, like Jest or Tape.
Selenium WebDriver, however, doesn’t enforce a testing framework on you. Besides, you don’t even have to make use of a testing framework.
You can write a common program that is not a test, a program that just moves the browser.
Lots of projects make use of WebDriver like that, for example, to crawl web pages and collect information.
But Cypress made a decision early enough that it is devoted to the task of writing frontend tests. Also, it can only be utilized within a testing framework, and the testing framework MUST be Mocha.
Bizarre Execution Model
We fully understand that the subheading for this section is weird. But that’s the truth!
Cypress's execution model is indeed bizarre! Whenever you call `cy.click` or `cy.navigate` or `cy.type`, you’re not executing that command.
You're only recording what you want to carry out when Cypress does run the test. The test doesn’t run inside the `it` function.
It runs after the `it` function ends, which is based on the commands you’ve recorded. `cy.nagivate/click/type` doesn’t execute, but it rather records, to be replayed later.
What is the practical repercussion of that decision for the developer? If you want to execute your code based on the value on the page, you won’t be able to.
Therefore, Cypress doesn’t follow a common execution model, as WebDriver does.
Built-In Server Mocking!
However, there is another major reason why Cypress is known as faster. Remember that Cypress is only meant for frontend developers.
Let us also have it in mind that front-end developers don’t make use of the real backend most times, but they rather mock the XML HTTP requests to the server.
This act makes for extraordinarily fast tests, on the order of seconds, irrespective of what you use, either Cypress or Selenium WebDriver.
But Selenium WebDriver doesn’t have the functions for that. And to accurately mock server responses, a WebDriver test would have to run a mock server that returns the correct responses.
While possible, it is a slower and much less easy option: a fast and in-memory function for mocking will perform better than a slow out-of-process one every time.
- Supports numerous browsers and development languages
- Built-in server mocking
- Scaling testing within a grid works nicely
- Easy to set up and use for JavaScript projects
- Professionals can offer advice on dealing with test flakiness
- New APIs designed to make writing easier
Cons
- Limited to MochaJS framework
- Out-of-process automation can be slower
- Limited to frontend testing
- Requires asynchronous communication
- Common execution model can be confusing
The main component to identify while choosing in-between Cypress and Selenium is not to find which one is better. But in reality, it is about identifying what works best for you.
Both tools have their own set of features. Choosing a particular tool depends on which one suits us best. InCypress vs Selenium both have benefits and drawbacks. What you require will determine which is best.
There are factors, such as the ease of creating scripts, reporting, and dashboards, but overall and when choosing any tool, it all comes down to the team's goals, skill set, test scope, and other product-specific factors. A fantastic tool for growing Cypress. It has an excellent execution environment built in and is quick to build up. It is entirely JavaScript/MochaJS oriented and contains new APIs designed to make writing easier.
On the other hand, Selenium is a well-established framework that supports numerous browsers and a variety of development languages. Additionally, scaling testing within a grid works nicely. Between the two instruments, there is some debate regarding the test flakiness factor.
Some claim that Cypress testing results in more durable and trustworthy test scripts, whereas Selenium professionals can offer advice on how to deal with such issues.
If you are confused about how to choose the right tool to test your software, here are a few things to look into:
Choosing language support:
You need specific language and tool specifications for each application-based web project you work on. This is the one aspect of the project that remains constant. It's a good idea to pick a testing tool that works with different languages, but it should also be the best tool for your programming language.
Focusing on a time frame:
It takes time to work on a large-scale online project. It makes sense that you'd prefer to spend more time developing the best features and less time testing. However, rushing through testing might result in subpar testing, which ultimately leads to project failure. So that you can concentrate on creating the best features, you need a tool that can complete the task effectively and in the shortest period of time.
Varied test running platform:
Tools that run various tests, including end-to-end, API, system, unit, etc., are required. It's convenient to utilize one tool for end-to-end testing and integration testing when working on a project that calls for both.
Flexible usage:
What if the tool you're using is great for testing but requires a lot of effort and time to customize for your use case? That device might not be the best option. The secret is to pick a tool that works well without having a severe learning curve.
A supportive community:
You will need to work in many languages and employ the tools your clients require as a developer. You won't be able to possibly know them all. Therefore, you'll need to pick up these technologies quickly. The kind of educational and instructive content that is available online will affect your ability to learn.
You can learn technology quickly and efficiently if it has comprehensive documentation and supportive users in the community. This is more significant than everything else on the list above because, no matter how good the tool, it won't help you if you don't know how to utilize it.
Save time and reduce errors with our Automated Testing service.
Our cutting-edge technology ensures your software runs smoothly, without the hassle of manual testing.
As you can see, based on the information above, both tools, Cypress and Selenium Web Driver looks, are quite similar. But there are lots of differences between the two tools.
The major reason for the differences, in my opinion, generates from the different requirements from the two tools:
Selenium was developed as a multi-language, cross-browser tool, which suits many purposes, not only testing.
Cypress, on the other hand, was developed for one thing, which is executing frontend developers tests consistently and within a short time.
Q. What is the main difference between Selenium and Cypress?
The main difference between Selenium and Cypress is their approach to testing. Selenium is based on the traditional approach of simulating user interactions by manipulating the browser, while Cypress takes a more modern approach of running tests in the same context as the application being tested.
Q. Which is easier to learn inCypress vs Selenium?
Cypress is generally considered easier to learn than Selenium. It has a simpler API and a more intuitive testing interface, which makes it easier for developers to get started with test automation.
Q. Which is fasterinCypress vs Selenium?
Cypress is generally faster than Selenium. Because Cypress runs tests in the same context as the application being tested, it is able to take advantage of the browser's internal event system to speed up test execution.
Q. Which has better browser compatibility inCypress vs Selenium?
Selenium has better browser compatibility than Cypress. Selenium supports a wider range of browsers and browser versions, while Cypress is limited to the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, and Edge.
Q. Which is more suitable for testing modern web applications inCypress vs Selenium?
Cypress is generally more suitable for testing modern web applications. Because modern web applications use more JavaScript and dynamic content, Cypress's modern approach to testing makes it easier to write and maintain tests for these applications.
Recently, there has been an argument about the new Champion of functional test automation tools. Some say it’s Cypress.io. because is interactive, fast, reliable and the greatest.
This argument leads us to the big question, “has Cypress successfully dethroned Selenium WebDriver?” Selenium which is currently the king of web automation and testing frameworks, has been known by many individuals for a while now. While its presumed usurper, which is still young, is growing at an incredibly fast rate.
Selenium is a test automation tool that allows developers to automate web browser testing.
The Selenium WebDriver protocol allows developers to send commands in diverse development languages such as Java, JavaScript, C#, Python, etc.
Right from the test environment (IDEs) to a desktop browser of your choice such as Chrome, Firefox, Edge, or Safari.
All the browsers have their unique Web Driver that is a reliance for the test to be able to accurately communicate and carry out the needed actions such as click, swipe, assert, etc.
As the leading solution, Selenium acts as a platform to standard test frameworks like Protractor, WebDriverIO, etc., and also mobile app testing frameworks such as Appium.
Having a view of the market trends based on adoption and downloads, it is discovered that Selenium is a major enabler for browser test automation.
The growth in the adoption of Cypress which has passed WebDriverIO in the number of downloads, which is so visible for everyone to see.
An Open-Source Software- All Selenium Projects (Selenium IDE, Selenium RC, Selenium WebDriver, and Selenium Grid) are available for free use and are distributed under the Apache 2.0 license. Anyone is welcome to download the source code and use it; however, selling modified code is not permitted.
Selenium supports various operating systems- Selenium WebDriver is a part of Selenium that serves as a browser automation framework that handles browser commands and supports multiple operating systems, including Windows, Linux, macOS, and Solaris.
One Selenium script for all browsers- Every day, the Selenium community works on and improvises. The most popular browsers globally, according to StatCounter, are Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Internet Explorer, Opera, and Edge. Selenium script is compatible with all of the aforementioned browsers.
Easy to implement- The Selenium automation framework is a tool that is relatively simple to use. It offers a user-friendly interface that makes it simple and efficient to design and run test scripts.
Better learning- When beginning with Selenium automation testing, developers and testers can benefit greatly from the documentation on the Selenium website. Selenium scripts are not the same as complicated, 100-page algorithms. Writing a few lines of code to automate your website’s capabilities is all it takes to create a Selenium script.
Limitations of Selenium
Copy Infographic
×
Time-consuming- In contrast to several other test automation frameworks, Selenium WebDriver does not add an IDE to the programming interface. As a result, while writing test scripts for specific jobs, testers must include stages.
Lacks built-in reporting feature- Testers can more easily generate and show test results thanks to licensed test automation frameworks’ built-in result-reporting functionality. Selenium still lacks the ability to generate result reports internally.
Single browser- Without writing test scripts, testers may test web applications with Selenium IDE. The record and playback tool allow a tester or even a developer to test websites without any prior programming knowledge.
Missed advanced features- Other test automation tools and frameworks now offer some of the most cutting-edge features that Selenium Automation Tool does not. The testers can add commands, breakpoints, and comments using this tool.
Testing mobile apps- We are unable to test Windows and mobile applications in Selenium. With the use of a WebDriver Protocol, the tester must use Appium to manage the Android and iOS apps.
Save time and reduce errors with our Automated Testing service.
Our cutting-edge technology ensures your software runs smoothly, without the hassle of manual testing.
Cypress is a JavaScript test automation solution for web applications. It allows teams to develop web test automation scripts.
The aim of this to enable frontend developers and test automation engineers to write web tests in the de-solution is to allow facto web language which is JavaScript.
Cypress also supports the Mocha test framework. So that the main technologies in which you would develop in your web test automation are Java Script.
Easy Setup – In Cypress, the setup is actually very simple because libraries and dependencies have already been established.
Supportive Snapshots– The Cypress framework takes pictures while the test is running. In the Command Log, this enables QAs or developers to hover over a specific command to view exactly what transpired at that particular stage.
Efficient process- It is not necessary to include wait-for commands in test scripts, either implicit or explicit. Prior to acting, it awaits orders and statements.
Automated scrolling– Before taking any action, the automated scrolling function makes sure that an element is visible (for example Clicking on a button).
Convenient visual feedback- Cypress runs instructions in real-time as the programmer types them, showing visual feedback as they do so. Cypress comes with top-notch documentation.
One at a time – Cypress cannot be used to run two browsers simultaneously.
No multi-language support- Unlike Selenium, Cypress only works on Java scripts and limits user options to work in multiple domains.
Limited options- Cypress forbids the testing of photos, videos, or audio. On the other hand, Selenium allows screen capture.
Browser support- Cypress doesn’t offer compatibility with browsers like Safari and IE. It is not possible to simultaneously drive two browsers.
Slower execution speed- The initial stage of Cypress testing execution pace is acceptable and may be appropriate for a demo, however, this would slow down as the app scaled.
Differences between Cypress and Selenium
Difference in terms of
Cypress
Selenium
Execution Speed
Uses in-browser execution to send commands via DOM events, resulting in synchronous, in-memory commands and fast tests.
Uses out-of-process communication to send commands via WebDriver, resulting in asynchronous communication and slower tests.
Testing Framework
Restricted to Mocha testing framework and can’t use other JavaScript frameworks like Jest or Tape.
No enforcement of testing framework and can use any JavaScript framework or even non-test programs.
Execution Model
Records commands like cy.click or cy.type to be replayed later after it function ends.
Executes commands directly, allowing for executing code based on the value on the page.
Built-In Server Mocking
Has built-in functions for mocking server responses, allowing for fast tests.
Doesn’t have built-in functions for mocking server responses and requires running a mock server, resulting in slower tests.
In terms of Speed
This in-browser execution is based on the speed of Cypress testing. With Cypress, you have just a process: which is the browser itself. With Cypress, your test code is running together with your application code.
So, an automation command such as clicking a button doesn’t send the command to the browser as WebDriver does via out-of-process communication. Rather, Cypress makes use of DOM events to send a click command to the button within a short time.
And while WebDriver’s out-of-process automation includes asynchronous communication, Cypress’ automation commands are mainly synchronous and in-memory. And it generates extraordinarily fast tests.
We know that speed is the major reason that front-end developers are totally in love with Cypress. WebDriver, at least perception-wise, wasn’t able to give them the speed that they required.
Frontend developers want to run their tests always, and they can’t afford the expense of a suite that takes about ten minutes to run. They desire to run their suite, and they require it to run in a minute or two, and nothing more.
Is the speed difference significant based on the claims of Cypress’ documentation claims? Based on the research carried out, the answer is Yes.
Although we are not convinced that the difference is worth the other benefits WebDriver has. You can try it yourself, by carrying out some little research and experiments.
Being Mocha!
Cypress doesn’t only restrict you in the language you can write, but also restricts the type of testing framework you can use.
Mocha is the testing framework on which you write your tests with a testing framework’s role in JavaScript similar to the role Junit has in Java, or NUnit in C#. You won’t be able to write your tests in another JavaScript framework, like Jest or Tape.
Selenium WebDriver, however, doesn’t enforce a testing framework on you. Besides, you don’t even have to make use of a testing framework.
You can write a common program that is not a test, a program that just moves the browser.
Lots of projects make use of WebDriver like that, for example, to crawl web pages and collect information.
But Cypress made a decision early enough that it is devoted to the task of writing frontend tests. Also, it can only be utilized within a testing framework, and the testing framework MUST be Mocha.
Bizarre Execution Model
We fully understand that the subheading for this section is weird. But that’s the truth!
Cypress’s execution model is indeed bizarre! Whenever you call `cy.click` or `cy.navigate` or `cy.type`, you’re not executing that command.
You’re only recording what you want to carry out when Cypress does run the test. The test doesn’t run inside the `it` function.
It runs after the `it` function ends, which is based on the commands you’ve recorded. `cy.nagivate/click/type` doesn’t execute, but it rather records, to be replayed later.
What is the practical repercussion of that decision for the developer? If you want to execute your code based on the value on the page, you won’t be able to.
Therefore, Cypress doesn’t follow a common execution model, as WebDriver does.
Built-In Server Mocking!
However, there is another major reason why Cypress is known as faster. Remember that Cypress is only meant for frontend developers.
Let us also have it in mind that front-end developers don’t make use of the real backend most times, but they rather mock the XML HTTP requests to the server.
This act makes for extraordinarily fast tests, on the order of seconds, irrespective of what you use, either Cypress or Selenium WebDriver.
But Selenium WebDriver doesn’t have the functions for that. And to accurately mock server responses, a WebDriver test would have to run a mock server that returns the correct responses.
While possible, it is a slower and much less easy option: a fast and in-memory function for mocking will perform better than a slow out-of-process one every time.
– Supports numerous browsers and development languages
– Built-in server mocking
– Scaling testing within a grid works nicely
– Easy to set up and use for JavaScript projects
– Professionals can offer advice on dealing with test flakiness
– New APIs designed to make writing easier
Cons
– Limited to MochaJS framework
– Out-of-process automation can be slower
– Limited to frontend testing
– Requires asynchronous communication
– Common execution model can be confusing
The main component to identify while choosing in-between Cypress and Selenium is not to find which one is better. But in reality, it is about identifying what works best for you.
Both tools have their own set of features. Choosing a particular tool depends on which one suits us best. InCypress vs Selenium both have benefits and drawbacks. What you require will determine which is best.
There are factors, such as the ease of creating scripts, reporting, and dashboards, but overall and when choosing any tool, it all comes down to the team’s goals, skill set, test scope, and other product-specific factors. A fantastic tool for growing Cypress. It has an excellent execution environment built in and is quick to build up. It is entirely JavaScript/MochaJS oriented and contains new APIs designed to make writing easier.
On the other hand, Selenium is a well-established framework that supports numerous browsers and a variety of development languages. Additionally, scaling testing within a grid works nicely. Between the two instruments, there is some debate regarding the test flakiness factor.
Some claim that Cypress testing results in more durable and trustworthy test scripts, whereas Selenium professionals can offer advice on how to deal with such issues.
If you are confused about how to choose the right tool to test your software, here are a few things to look into:
Choosing language support:
You need specific language and tool specifications for each application-based web project you work on. This is the one aspect of the project that remains constant. It’s a good idea to pick a testing tool that works with different languages, but it should also be the best tool for your programming language.
Focusing on a time frame:
It takes time to work on a large-scale online project. It makes sense that you’d prefer to spend more time developing the best features and less time testing. However, rushing through testing might result in subpar testing, which ultimately leads to project failure. So that you can concentrate on creating the best features, you need a tool that can complete the task effectively and in the shortest period of time.
Varied test running platform:
Tools that run various tests, including end-to-end, API, system, unit, etc., are required. It’s convenient to utilize one tool for end-to-end testing and integration testing when working on a project that calls for both.
Flexible usage:
What if the tool you’re using is great for testing but requires a lot of effort and time to customize for your use case? That device might not be the best option. The secret is to pick a tool that works well without having a severe learning curve.
A supportive community:
You will need to work in many languages and employ the tools your clients require as a developer. You won’t be able to possibly know them all. Therefore, you’ll need to pick up these technologies quickly. The kind of educational and instructive content that is available online will affect your ability to learn.
You can learn technology quickly and efficiently if it has comprehensive documentation and supportive users in the community. This is more significant than everything else on the list above because, no matter how good the tool, it won’t help you if you don’t know how to utilize it.
Save time and reduce errors with our Automated Testing service.
Our cutting-edge technology ensures your software runs smoothly, without the hassle of manual testing.
As you can see, based on the information above, both tools, Cypress and Selenium Web Driver looks, are quite similar. But there are lots of differences between the two tools.
The major reason for the differences, in my opinion, generates from the different requirements from the two tools:
Selenium was developed as a multi-language, cross-browser tool, which suits many purposes, not only testing.
Cypress, on the other hand, was developed for one thing, which is executing frontend developers tests consistently and within a short time.
Q. What is the main difference between Selenium and Cypress?
The main difference between Selenium and Cypress is their approach to testing. Selenium is based on the traditional approach of simulating user interactions by manipulating the browser, while Cypress takes a more modern approach of running tests in the same context as the application being tested.
Q. Which is easier to learn inCypress vs Selenium?
Cypress is generally considered easier to learn than Selenium. It has a simpler API and a more intuitive testing interface, which makes it easier for developers to get started with test automation.
Q. Which is fasterinCypress vs Selenium?
Cypress is generally faster than Selenium. Because Cypress runs tests in the same context as the application being tested, it is able to take advantage of the browser’s internal event system to speed up test execution.
Q. Which has better browser compatibility inCypress vs Selenium?
Selenium has better browser compatibility than Cypress. Selenium supports a wider range of browsers and browser versions, while Cypress is limited to the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, and Edge.
Q. Which is more suitable for testing modern web applications inCypress vs Selenium?
Cypress is generally more suitable for testing modern web applications. Because modern web applications use more JavaScript and dynamic content, Cypress’s modern approach to testing makes it easier to write and maintain tests for these applications.
With automated testing tools like selenium, You can increase the effectiveness, efficiency and test coverage of your software application. Cynoteck technology help organizations deliver batter quality software/applications by using automated testing tools. get in touch with us for any assistance.
